Review process
The review process will be double-blind.
Each paper will be reviewed by at least two members of scientific committee. The acceptance decisions will take into account paper novelty, technical depth, elegance, practical or theoretic impact, and presentation.
01
Original:
the paper explores a new idea, project or issue; discusses existing research with promise of new insight, discusses new research; or presents new ways of considering existing information
02
Engaging:
presentation format will involve the audience in some way, or has high potential to attract conference attendees by addressing needs of the community
03
Significant:
the paper raises and discusses issues important to improving the effectiveness and/or sustainability of open education efforts, and its contents can be broadly disseminated and understood
04
Data Analytics
Share some details here for Service four. This is a flexible section where you can share anything you want. It could be details or some information about your service.
05
Quality:
claims are supported by sufficient data; claims draw upon relevant literature; and limitations are described honestly
06
Relevant:
the paper addresses one or more of the themes of the conference